Issue no. 70 (Winter 2002/03)
All the Way: Crafting a U.S.-Russian Alliance (an
excerpt)
Robert Legvold
So what might animate a U.S.-Russian alliance? The core focus can and
should be stability and mutual security in and around the Eurasian land
mass. This has three aspects. First, as Alexander Vershbow, the current
U.S. ambassador in Moscow, puts it: "Russia is the most important key
to the stability of Eurasia" itself, without which neither Europe nor
Asia, two regions in which the United States has vital interests, can
"be stable and prosperous." As long as Russia respects the
sovereignty of the former Soviet republics, the United States has every
reason to cooperate with Russia in stabilizing and aiding those states. In
this regard, as well as others, alliance does not mean condominium;
U.S.-Russian collaboration must not imply a readiness to decide matters
over the heads of Russia’s neighbors. On the contrary, an alliance’s
purpose would be to strengthen their sovereignty and vitality. One example
of the subtle way in which the revolution in Russian foreign policy makes
this kind of alliance possible concerns Belarus. Putin’s new agenda has
led to a sharp cooling in Russia’s relations with Alexander Lukashenko’s
regime. As a consequence, a leadership that flouts the values on which
modern European security is based is increasingly isolated, the prospect
of a Russian-Belarusian union has faded and Ukraine’s fears of
encirclement have eased. Although not perfectly parallel, U.S. and Russian
interests in Belarus, Ukraine and Moldova now converge sufficiently to
make promoting stability and successful reform there a matter of common
U.S. and Russian ground.
Second, to borrow the formulation of Alexei Bogaturov, in the 21st
century no longer is peninsular Europe or Northeast Asia the critical
"strategic rear" of the United States, but the vast turbulent
region stretching from eastern Turkey to western China and along Russia’s
south. As the United States girds to cope with the threats emanating from
this area, no country brings more value as a potential ally than Russia.
As things stand, the United States has backed into Central Asia with
military power as part of the war against terrorism, and in the process it
has offered quasi-security commitments to its new partners, almost
certainly without careful consideration of their wider implication.
Central Asia forms the unstable core of Inner Asia; it is an area—the
only one in the world—surrounded by four nuclear powers, two of whom
recently teetered on the brink of war. It contains multiple points of
friction, from Kashmir to the Fergana Valley to northwest Kazakhstan to
China’s Xinjiang province, each of them capable of bleeding into a
larger conflict. It is populated by regimes whose stability is universally
suspect. And it contains wealth, particularly in energy resources, that
will make it increasingly important to both Asian and European consumers.
Not only, therefore, are the United States and Russia directly but
separately implicated in the stability of the region, but a third country,
China, is as well. This raises the third aspect of a U.S.-Russian alliance
to enhance Eurasian stability. China will be a decisive actor in Inner
Asia, not the least because it forms an integral part of the region.
Unfortunately, China enters through its underdeveloped northwest
territories, including Xinjiang, precisely where it feels most vulnerable.
In part because of this sense of vulnerability, and in part because of the
general state of Sino-American relations, China has not welcomed the
arrival of American military power in Central Asia. On the contrary, while
excusing a temporary deployment in the context of a war that it supports,
China’s leadership has opposed an extended U.S. presence there as an
element of a hostile encirclement stratagem.
Russia and the United States have good reason to act jointly, not only
to enhance their common stake in regional stability, but to draw China
into a constructive dialogue over the role all three will play in Central
Asia. Russia, with the Shanghai Cooperation Organization, is already
engaged in such an effort. Talking to the Russians about U.S. military
activities in Central Asia (and Georgia) builds mutual confidence by
promoting transparency, but it is not so far-fetched to imagine a far more
ambitious trilateral dialogue among Russia, China, and the United States.
Much as the United States and its European allies share assessments of
threats at the edges of Europe, plan for coordinated action, and struggle
to create the necessary machinery, so can and should Russia and the United
States do the same in Eurasia, with Chinese participation when
appropriate.
Russia and the United States allied against the new century’s primary
strategic threats, particularly those emanating from within and around the
Eurasian land mass, would have much the same significance in the emerging
international order as key U.S. alliances have had in the last. Even more
so will this be the case if the alliance is underpinned by Russia’s
successful integration into the international economy and safe passage to
democracy.
Robert Legvold is professor of political science at Columbia University
and editor of the forthcoming Thinking Strategically: The Major Powers,
Kazakhstan, and the Central Asian Nexus (The MIT Press).