Four
Observations about the Fate of the Chinese Communist Party
May
7, 2003
By Jinghao Zhou
Today,
only a few communist parties remain in power around the
world.
China, of course, is the
largest country still ruled by a communist party, and
the Communist Party of China (CCP) is the largest party,
with 64 million party members.
Yet, what is its future?
In the aftermath of the Sixteenth National
Conference of the CCP, I visited
China
and concluded that,
while the CCP is still in control of the country, its
power is diminishing, its reputation is declining, the
party branch at work units is paralyzed, Chinese elite
are escaping from the party and the communist faith is
disappearing.
Even through the party has managed to survive
into the 21st century, few Chinese people
even within the party truly believe in communism.
The majority of the Chinese people see the
potential for a serious crisis ahead.
Observation
One: The Party is Disappearing From Sight
Before
the reform movement, the CCP was the supreme power,
controlling all aspects of Chinese society.
The authority of the party was not only reflected
in its organizations, but it was made visible as well.
There were posters at roadsides and in public
places; signboards proclaiming the location of party
branches were displayed at the front of every work unit.
They were as common in
China
as the signs for
McDonalds and gasoline stations are in the
United States
.
TV and movies were filled with images of the CCP
at work. The
Party was everywhere.
On this trip, my first stop in
China
was
Shanghai
.
It was about 20 miles from
Pudong
International
Airport
to my hotel. On the way, I
kept a close watch on the roadside, yet found no
monuments or billboards concerning the party; in fact, I
saw nothing except innumerable commercial
advertisements. I traveled by bus from
Shanghai
to
Nanjing
through Zheng Jiang,
Changzhou
, and
Suzhou
, the most developed
regions in
China
, and then took the
train coming back from
Nanjing
to
Shanghai
.
Throughout my travels, I found that the visible
signs of the party have been completely replaced by
commercial buildings, housings, shopping malls, and
commercial signs and advertisements.
In these cities, I spent at least two days
walking on the street and trying to find visible signs
of the party's existence, but failed.
All signboards of the party at the front of work
units, companies, factories, hospitals, schools,
universities, department stores, grocery stores, and
residential committees had disappeared.
(The only exception was signs advertising the
offices of the party committees at the district level or
higher.)
If I were not native Chinese, I might not realize that
China
is still officially a
communist country. Whether
termed "socialist" or "capitalist,"
the market economy in
China
is greatly expending.
And, as the market expands, the party loses territory.
If
China
continues its rapid
pace of marketization, the time will soon come when the
party’s monopoly on political power will be over as
well.
Observation
Two: Party Cadres Are Working Second Jobs
In the past, the main cadres of every party branch at a workplace took full-time positions, engaging in
so-called political and ideological work.
In previous years, many people were eager to get
this kind of appointment because these jobs were easy
and came with great privileges.
An acquaintance of mine, a Mr. Tang, was a
faithful party member and joined the party at 18 years
old (according to the Constitution of the CCP, the age
of 18 is the minimum age to join the party).
He had risen through the ranks to become the
party committee (chair) at a factory. I remembered that
his office was the most luxurious one, symbolizing his
authority over the factory's operation.
I followed the well-remembered path to his
office, but I arrived to discover that Mr. Tang no longer
occupied that office; he had been displaced by the
general manager of the factory.
(My assumption is that given the economic
reforms, the manager was now truly in charge of the
factory's operation.)
I went in search of Mr. Tang and finally located
his office--the last door on the third floor.
Knocking on the door and waiting for a while, he
finally opened the door and led me in.
He told me that he "asked" for this
office, as it was quiet.
“What are you doing?” I asked directly--in
the past, his office would have been open and filled
with visitors, petitioners and so on.
“You can figure out what I am doing, even if
you haven’t lived in
China
for a long time.”
“You must be doing something for yourself, I
guess.”
“Yes,
I am doing my second job, chao
gu (playing stock).”
He continued, “I have no choice.
I try my best, but I am preparing for the worst
before my position is eliminated.
You know that gai
zhi (the change in ownership of enterprises) has
been going forward on a large scale.
The government requires all small and
medium-sized enterprises to go private.
This reform will be completed by the end of this
year. Nobody
knows what roles the party will have to play in work
units. So my
job is unstable and my future is unpredictable.”
Through my investigation, I have learned that
some party cadres were already persuaded to retire; some
became unemployed; some shifted their positions from
political work to professional duties; and some, like
Mr. Tang, work at "second" jobs.
It is evident that party cadres at work units no
longer concentrate on party work.
In work units, there is no regular party meeting;
party members are not required to write reports on their
activities and those of their co-workers; party offices
were absent of visitors; and party jobs no longer
attract willing applicants.
The party in work units actually exists in name
only. Most
of the time party cadres just stay in their office doing
nothing. The
public opinion in
China
is that the full-time
position of party cadres is not necessary at work units.
Mr. Liu, a friend of mine, is a head of the party
committee at the district level, but I found he was also
equipped with a pager and cellular phone.
Without doubt, he was dealing with “personal
matters.” This
raises a very serious issue: if the party leadership at
the provincial level (and higher) remains convinced that
the party is the sole leadership for
China
, how can the party
manage to implement its vision if, at the grass-roots
level, this is the reality that awaits them?
As they say in Chinese, pi zhi bu cun mao jiang yan fu (with the skin gone, to what can the
hair attach itself)?
Observation Three: Party Members No
Longer believe in Communism
In
China
, I asked party
members some basic questions: “Who is the author of
the Manifesto?” “What
is communism?” “What
is the final goal of communism?” “What are the
general tasks of the party at present?” It seemed that
all these questions to them were funny and naïve, and
therefore, beyond their consideration.
Before the reform movement, the Chinese people
thought that the party was performing a sacred mission,
and most party members had serious commitments to the
party. However,
at present, party members no longer have serious faith
in the party and communism.
They told me that their original intention to
join the party was not for the goal of communism but
for their personal interests.
In their words, “Communism has nothing to do
with me!”
So,
why is it that membership has increased to 64 million?
First, the ratio of party members among the
Chinese population actually is in decline.
China
had 900 million
people and 50 million party members in 1976.
At that time, 5.5 percent of the population were
party members. Today
China
has 1.3 billion people and 64 million party members.
So at present only 4.9 percent of the Chinese
population are party members.
Second, a large number of party branches are
actually paralyzed.
In urban areas, party branches at small work
units do not function at all. In addition, there are
about 20 million people who are "floating"
between the countryside and the cities, and 47 million
unemployed individuals in
China
.
It is certain that some of them are party members
who are no longer active party members, although it is
difficult to get an accurate percentage.
Third, the stratum of party members has been changed.
Based on the Research Report on Social Rank in China, published by the Academy of
Social Sciences of China in 2002, in the post-Mao era,
the most "advanced" social ranks are
professionals, managers, big private owners, and general
office workers. The
four social ranks altogether only make up 11% of the
total Chinese population.
However, those people--by any definition the real
elite of China--
are less interested in becoming
party members.
Observation
Four: Chinese Elites Have Lost Interest in Joining the
Party
Prior
to the reforms, the party had exacting standards for
accepting party members.
Whoever wanted to join the party had to go
through the following stages: submitting an application,
handing in "confessional" reports, being
evaluated and interviewed, having an extensive
background investigation, filling out the formal
application, having one's candidacy voted on by the
party branch, and, finally, becoming a probationary
party member. One
was qualified to become a formal party member after the
swearing-in ceremony if she/he made no mistakes over the
course of one year.
Although it was a very complicated and long
process, the majority of the Chinese people tried very
hard to seek the opportunity to join the party, because dang
piao (the title of party member) used to be critical
for professional advancement.
When
I interviewed non-party members, including Chinese
officials, intellectuals, college students, businessmen,
workers, and peasants, I asked them whether they were
interested in joining the party.
95 percent answered "no."
The reason is very simple: the reform movement
has opened up many ways for the Chinese people to reach
their goals. Becoming
a party member is only one of the ways and is
increasingly viewed as an uncertain guarantee of
success. In
order to have a stable and good life, most Chinese
people believe that three things—intelligence,
education, and money—are the most important.
The slogan of “time is money” already has
become popular. The
Chinese people look upon party activities as an “extra
tax.” They
like to spend their time not on party activities, but on
receiving education, making money, and having fun.
When I asked them the question: “Why don’t
you join the party?”
They always answered my question with a question:
“Why do I need to join the party?”
Since they are capable of making their life
comfortable without dang
piao, they do not like to be restricted by the
political and spiritual shackles of membership.
Obviously,
dang piao is no longer attractive to the Chinese
people, especially to the talented elite and the younger
generation. Under
these circumstances, the party must persuade people to
become party members through different means, including
reducing the requirements for membership.
Nonetheless, it is still not easy for the party
to increase its membership.
I found that people who have less education,
fewer professional skills and less money, are more
interested in becoming party members.
All
of this will create problems in the future.
A party that cannot recruit the elite of Chinese
society will have a great deal of difficulty remaining
the governing body of
China
.
Jinghao Zhou is an assistant professor
of Asian studies at
Hobart
and
William
Smith
Colleges
.
|