Privatization and the Oil Industry:
A Strategy for Postwar Iraqi Reconstruction
Ariel Cohen and Gerald P. O'Driscoll,
Jr.
As the Bush Administration and Iraqi opposition groups
plan the future of a post-Saddam Hussein Iraq without
its menacing arsenal of weapons of mass destruction (WMD),
economic issues also loom large on the horizon.
Saddam's grip on oil has dangerous security
repercussions for the United States and its allies.
According to the U.S. General Accounting Office, oil
smuggling and illegal surcharges of 25 cents to 50 cents
on a barrel of legal oil are providing the funds to
bolster Saddam's regime. Saddam’s unaccounted revenues
are at least $6.6 billion—revenues available to
develop WMD and support terrorism in spite of economic
sanctions imposed by the United Nations on Iraq after
the Persian Gulf War. (1) (This in spite of the fact
that the United Nations intended to lift the sanctions
in exchange for Saddam giving up his program to develop
WMD.)
Saddam's regime has succeeded in bankrupting the
country, even though it boasts the world's second
largest oil reserves after Saudi Arabia. The oil sector
provides more than 60 percent of the country's gross
domestic product (GDP) and 95 percent of its hard
currency earnings. Yet GDP for 2001, at the market
exchange rate, is estimated to be only about one-third
its 1989 level. Iraq also is hobbled by its $140 billion
foreign debt. This devastation was wrought by such
policies as the nationalization of the country's chief
export commodity, oil; extensive central planning of
industry and trade; the 1982-1988 war against Iran; and
the invasion of Kuwait, which precipitated the 1991 Gulf
War. Iraq's economy has been grossly mismanaged. Sound
economics are needed to help the Iraqi people rebuild
their lives and their country after two decades of wars
and four decades of repression under the current regime.
A postwar economic strategy is necessary, which will
be beneficial for the industrial world, the countries of
the Middle East and the developing world. The full
reintegration of Iraq's oil industry into the global
marketplace would allow a more abundant and stable
energy supply and a greater revenue flow for the Iraqi
budget, foster a higher living standard for the Iraqi
people, and provide numerous business opportunities for
the region and the world.
The way out of the economic morass for the Iraqi
economy lies through privatization of its abundant oil
assets, not bureaucratic mismanagement, as some have
advocated. If successful, Iraq's privatization of its
oil sector, refining capacity, and pipeline
infrastructure, could serve as a model for
privatizations by other OPEC members, thereby weakening
the cartel's domination of the energy markets.
The road to economic prosperity in Iraq will not be
easily paved, but the Bush Administration can help the
future Iraqi government achieve fundamental structural
reform with massive, orderly, and transparent
privatization of various sectors of the economy,
including the oil industry. The United States should
offer its guidance on establishing sound economic and
trade policies to stimulate growth and recovery.
Privatization efforts in other countries demonstrate
that privately held infrastructure, oil, and oil service
companies attract modern technology and management
expertise, produce greater efficiencies, improve
production standards, and generate higher revenues than
do centrally planned and state-owned industries. The
same can be achieved in Iraq, whose oil industry cannot
thrive without access to global capital markets.
In particular, the Administration should work with
opposition leaders in Iraq to convince them now that a
future Iraqi federal government must develop mechanisms
for privatizing these industries and taxing oil sales,
and for sharing the proceeds equitably with the three
major ethnic regions: Kurds in the North, Shi’a Arabs
in the South, and Sunni Arabs in the central region. (In
our opinion, the best model for postwar Iraq is a
federal system that incorporates the various factions
and regional leaders.)
Obviously, the immediate priorities of the postwar
administration will be the restoration of order and the
full dismantling of the Ba'athi dictatorship. However,
economic reform cannot be neglected. In the months
following the removal of Saddam Hussein from power, the
United States and its allies (as well as relevant
international organizations) must provide the necessary
technical and financial assistance that enables the
Iraqis to create modern legal environment that
recognizes property rights and is conducive to
privatization. A key role here can be played by the
large and successful Iraqi expatriate community (as well
as other Western-educated Iraqis) to provide the
personnel, expertise and entrepreneurial know-how that
can ensure a successful privatization reform. Contrary
to the advice proffered by some in the international NGO
community, prices will need to be deregulated, including
in the utilities and the energy sector. Finally, it
should be a top priority to liberalize Iraq's trade,
with an eye to eventual Iraqi membership in the World
Trade Organization. Restoring Iraq quickly to the global
economic mainstream is critical to end the damage caused
by decades of isolation and to lift the living standard.
Economic growth will be an important contribution to
the stabilization of Iraq, allowing the United States
and other forces stationed there to depart after
assuring that Iraq's WMD threat and repressive regime
have ended. Structural reform and comprehensive
privatization is a winning strategy for the people of
Iraq, its future government, the region, and the United
States.
(1) A point tellingly made by Richard Perle. Cf. his
remarks to In the National Interest at