|
My Enemy's
Friend is My...?
Cole Bucy
Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon’s landmark visit to
New Delhi
two weeks ago may have been cut short by violence at
home, but this did not stop him from having a productive
trip.
Israel’s $1 billion sale of a Phalcon radar system to
India was only the highlight of several diplomatic and
military moves made which brought India and Israel
closer together. Some observers of the Israel-India
courtship have euphorically proclaimed that this new
“strategic alliance” will make India a key Israeli ally
in the fight against terrorism. The Brookings
Institution’s Parag Khanna, writing in the September 10
issue of In The National Interest, believes that
Israel and India, along with Turkey, can make up a
pro-US, democratic counterweight to the famed “axis of
evil.” Such sentiment is not limited to outsiders – the
chairman of the Knesset’s Foreign Affairs and Defense
Committee has even said that Israel’s relationship with
India is now second only to its relationship with the
US.
However, one need only check Indian Prime Minister
Atal Bihari
Vajpayee’s
guestbook in New Delhi to understand how problematic
Israel’s enthusiasm might be. Only ten days before
Sharon’s arrival, Iranian Foreign Minister Kamal
Kharazzi visited New Delhi to reaffirm Iran’s own
“strategic partnership” with India. Kharazzi’s visit
was only the latest in series of meetings between
high-level Iranian and Indian officials. In fact,
Iranian President Mohammed Khatami was in New Delhi
himself this past January for India’s Republic Day
celebrations, and Vajpayee has been to Tehran several
times in recent years, prompting a different set of
observers to warily note India’s blossoming relationship
with the Islamic Republic.
Though this bizarre diplomatic twist appears to fly in
the face of zero-sum, geopolitical logic, India has
nevertheless managed to somehow profoundly improve its
relations with both Israel and Iran simultaneously.
Given both Israel’s and Iran’s propensity to be
hyper-sensitive on issues involving the other, India has
achieved a rare feat indeed. A closer look at the
dynamics of this peculiar situation reveals a very
active Indian diplomatic corps driven to satisfy its
rising power’s diverse demands, which Israel and Iran,
combined, best meet. While Israel offers India
much-needed access to advanced military technology and
counter-terrorism know-how, Iran offers India strategic,
geographic advantages vis-ŕ-vis Pakistan and a supply of
energy India desperately needs for the future.
India
and Israel
Thus far, military cooperation has dominated the
Indian-Israeli agenda, though the two countries do have
over $1 billion in commercial trade annually. Israel
has one of the world’s most technologically
sophisticated militaries and has increasingly been
willing to sell its products abroad. India’s almost
rabid desire for military modernization and the
inability of its main arms dealer (Russia) to satisfy
India’s demand for high-tech military equipment make it
an ideal customer for Israel’s superior hardware. India
is now Israel’s biggest military customer and, in
addition to the Phalcon radar system, Israel is
considering the sale of its cutting edge theater
ballistic missile defense system, the Arrow.
In addition, Israel’s experience dealing with Islamic
extremism and terror makes military cooperation even
more attractive to New Delhi. India’s fight against
Islamic terror and extremism in Kashmir
shares the same tactical challenges as
Israel does with the
Palestinian Intifada. Though Israel has clearly
not found a solution to its ongoing conflict with the
Palestinians, Israeli security forces have become
masters of the tactics and strategies used in
counter-terrorism. India cannot get better
counter-terrorism training and assistance anywhere to
aid its own military’s fight against Kashmiri
separatists and Pakistan-backed terrorists.
In return, Israel gains a large, powerful ally in a very
hostile region of the world – something that should not
be underestimated. Plus, India shares Israel’s interest
in fighting Islamic extremism and terror. Israel will
greatly benefit from Sharon’s and Vajpayee’s recent
agreement on real-time intelligence sharing and help
with tracking specific terrorist organizations and
personnel. As such,
Israel
has every right to be pleased in its success in turning
a once extremely pro-Palestinian opponent into a close
tactical ally.
India
and Iran
Amid their frequent high-level meetings, Iran and India
have produced several recent agreements for economic and
military cooperation. On the economic front,
Indian-Iranian commercial trade has ballooned to over
$25 billion and will only continue to grow, especially
in the energy field. During Khatami’s visit to New
Delhi, the two countries agreed to a new, long-term
energy deal, whereby
Iran
will supply
India with 5 million tons of natural gas each year for
the next 25 years. More energy deals appear in the
offing as India’s growing energy needs make it a natural
market for Iranian oil and gas exports – currently there
are talks about a major pipeline to connect Iran and
India.
In addition to economic cooperation, Indian-Iranian
military cooperation is also growing. In March 2003,
India and Iran staged a joint naval exercise, and Iran
has given India permission to build a naval port on the
southeastern corner of the Iranian coastline at
Chahbahar.
Both Iran and India were Soviet military client states
and both of their militaries still largely consist of
Russian-made weapons platforms and technologies. As
such, the substantially more advanced Indian military is
ideal for providing Iran with crucial mid-life upgrades
to its conventional forces, including its T-72 tanks and
MiG 29 fighters. In addition, Indian expertise in these
conventional platforms can be passed on to Iran via new
training and technical assistance programs, which will
significantly improve the quality of Iranian armed
forces.
There are rumors of even more intimate military
cooperation; it is reported that India and Iran agreed
to a defense pact whereby, in exchange for Indian
military assistance and training for Iran, India is
given access to Iranian air space and military bases in
the event that India has another war with Pakistan. If
Tehran and New Delhi truly did agree to such a pact,
Pakistan’s “rear” would be vulnerable to an Indian
attack along Iran’s 568 mile border with western
Pakistan. Clearly, such an agreement would dramatically
tilt the balance of power in South Asia in India’s
favor.
It is highly unlikely that such a groundbreaking
military agreement does in fact exist. However, the mere
fact that its possibility is in question reveals how
relatively close Iran and India have become. Iran’s
Islamic fundamentalism and India’s distrust of such
Islamic extremism remain as pitfalls. However, the
ideological gulf that still separates Tehran and New
Delhi, though partially alleviated by their mutual
antagonism towards the Wahabi extremism found in
Afghanistan and Pakistan, appears to have been largely
trumped, for the time being, by geopolitical concerns.
International
Reactions
India’s
gravity-defying diplomacy shows that international
relations are more complex than the old mantra “a friend
of my enemy is my enemy” would indicate. While
Iran, India and
Israel all seem willing to live with this extremely
unique situation, its sustainability remains in
question. So far, India has been able to grow closer to
Iran and Israel simultaneously because the respective
areas of cooperation have been largely distinct.
For example, there is very little crossover between
Iran’s and Israel’s military ties with India. Though
Israel would obviously prefer that India not help Iran
upgrade its conventional forces, especially its air
force, Israel will not object too strongly. Yet, Israel
has kept a close eye on Tehran’s dealings with New Delhi
and made it clear last week during Sharon’s visit that
under no circumstances can Israeli military technology
be transferred, or in any other way be used, to assist
Iran. Given that
Israel
has largely sold India very sophisticated military
equipment and India has largely sold Iran
last-generation upgrades for Iran’s conventional forces,
India is unlikely to endanger its burgeoning arms trade
with Tel Aviv by making illicit transfers to Iran.
Washington has its hands too full to care too much about
India making some extra cash selling Iran spare parts
and fixing its old Soviet tanks, but it is worried about
the prospect of greater Indian-Iranian military
cooperation becoming more serious down the road. There
is concern that, as the relationship matures, personal
contacts and rising levels of trust might give way to
closer cooperation on Iran’s nuclear and missile
programs. To
its credit, India is unlikely to help Iran in these more
delicate areas, as it would be counter to India’s own
interests to see another nuclear power in South Asia.
Still, India is no US ally when it comes to
nonproliferation. It sees American hostility towards
Iran as being counter to its interests and vehemently
opposes Iran’s “axis of evil” labeling as provocative
and destabilizing.
Observers of future developments between these three
countries need to keep in mind that a black-and-white,
“with us or against us” view of the world overly
simplifies the true complexities of South Asia’s
geopolitics. India is an emerging regional power with
the world’s second largest population; its interests are
so widespread that neither Iran nor Israel is likely to
become too central to India’s future. As such,
Israel
and Iran should only count on Indian support and
cooperation wherever their interests overlap. Thus,
those who believe India is Israel’s new best friend
should temper their expectations. At the same time,
Israel and India undoubtedly do have common vital
interests on which it is advantageous to cooperate.
Those worried about India’s ties with a member of the
“axis of evil” should similarly understand that India
has economic and security interests worth maximizing
through cooperation with Iran. Conversely, Iran’s
radical fundamentalism and clandestine proliferation
ensures that
Tehran’s and
New Delhi’s coziness do not extend beyond where their
mutual interests overlap.
Cole Bucy is the Assistant Editor of In The
National Interest.
|