Fallout from the Madrid Attacks
March 17, 2004
By Derrick Hill
“Events, dear boy, events,” British Statesman Harold
Macmillan famously replied when asked what governments
most fear. He meant, of course, those real life
happenings that can appear out of seemingly clear blue
skies – events such as the Spanish people’s brutal
dismissal from power of Jose Maria Aznar’s ruling
Partido Popular (PP) .
This
wholly unexpected ending of conservative rule in Spain surely had the lights
burning late at the White House and Foggy Bottom last week. The sensational
result of Spain’s general election on March 14 not only robs President Bush
and America of a staunch and politically courageous ally in the war against
terror, but it could also ignominiously undermine the whole enterprise.
Nor is
that all. Within Europe, Spain’s new socialist government will be an eager
participant in moves that further the agenda of those determined to thwart
or constrain what they see as American ‘unilateralism’.
Prime
Minister-elect José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero has already confirmed the
implacable opposition of his party – the Partido Socialista Obrero Español (PSOE)
– to the war in Iraq and the continuing occupation. In his first press
conference after his victory, he reaffirmed that he will withdraw Spain’s
1,300-strong military force in Iraq by the end of June if the scheduled
transfer of sovereignty does not take place.
The
new occupant of the
Moncloa
Palace
(home of Spanish Prime Ministers) is indeed a totally different animal from
the man he succeeds.
The
44-year-old Zapatero, a lawyer, has the full set of European left-wing,
politically-correct attitudes, including – it hardly needs saying – visceral
contempt for America
– a Republican-led America above all. This is the party leader who, last
October, refused to join King Juan Carlos and government ministers in
standing and applauding the U.S. flag as it was marched past the reviewing
stand during a military parade in Madrid to mark Spain’s national day.
This
is the prime minister-elect who, within hours of his victory at the polls –
a triumph that came almost certainly courtesy of the Islamic terrorists who
slaughtered 200 people in bomb attacks on crowded early morning commuter
trains in Madrid only three days before – sees fit to instruct President
Bush and British Prime Minister Tony Blair to ‘engage in some
self-criticism” over the decision to invade Iraq.
And
this is the statesman who airily proclaims that “wars such as those which
have occurred in Iraq only allow hatred, violence and terror to proliferate”
– seemingly oblivious of the fact that this is exactly what Saddam Hussein
inflicted on his hapless people for decades.
Meanwhile, Zapatero cannot wait to begin ingratiating himself with Jacques
Chirac and Gerhard Shroeder and ending the froideur caused by Aznar’s
refusal to fall in with their ruthless determination to ensure that the EU
develops in line with Franco-German self-interest. The possibility of
Zapatero even thinking of defying the EU’s Big Two in any difference of
opinion with the U.S. is zero.
But
though the thought of
Spain’s
abrupt departure from the ‘coalition of the willing’ is worrying enough for
U.S. policymakers, the reason for it is cause for even greater concern.
Four
days before the election, Aznar’s party, under his designated successor
Mariano Rajoy (Aznar had earlier announced he was stepping down as leader
after his two terms in office), was coasting to a third consecutive win.
Against the backdrop of a booming economy, enjoying falling inflation and
rising employment, the polls were unanimous in showing that Spaniards had
little interest in a socialist mix of policies that were economically risky
and socially liberal.
Then
came the Madrid bombings on March 11.
At
first it was assumed, justifiably, that this barbarism was the work of the
Basque terrorist group ETA, whose recent attempts to carry out atrocities in
Madrid had been thwarted by the security services. Had it been the work of
ETA, the PP would doubtless have won the election with even greater ease
than seemed likely up to the 24 hours before.
But it
turns out that the perpetrators were almost certainly Islamic terrorists,
who seem, as of this writing, to have links with Al-Qaeda.
This
revelation changed everything. To shocked and angry Spaniards, the
slaughter no longer seemed an assault on democracy demanding a show of
solidarity. Rather it became – with the artful assistance or at the very
least tacit agreement of Zapatero’s socialist and their political and media
allies – a savage blow struck solely as a result of Aznar’s decision to
involve Spain in an enterprise overwhelmingly opposed by the its people.
Mobs
‘spontaneously’ demonstrating outside PP offices in major cities on the day
before the election carried placards saying “Aznar assassin,” “Thanks Aznar
for the war in Iraq:
consequence – 200 dead” and “You fascists are the terrorists.”
The
next day, in a turnout almost 10 per cent higher than in the election four
years ago, the voters did indeed act as though they wished to punish the PP
for what had been inflicted upon them because of Spain’s involvement in
Iraq.
So
much for the massed demonstrations, the day after the bombings, at which the
Spanish people, in their millions, declared their refusal to be cowed by
terrorism.
Attempting to take some comfort from the events of a traumatic and
tumultuous four days, politicians and commentators have claimed that the
trouble-free election and the high voter participation were a ‘victory for
democracy.’
The
brutal truth, of course, is that the election was not a victory for
democracy but for terrorists, who have got the very result that they
intended. The land of the conquistadors has chosen appeasement rather than
defiance.
President Bush and his advisors must be aware that, in a Europe increasingly
appeasing and pacifistic, this terrible lesson will not be lost on other
governments supposedly enlisted in the war against international terrorism.
(Zapatero’s secret weapon for fighting terrorism in Spain is an
anti-terrorist pact with the other parties!)
More
chillingly still, the message from Spain’s political earthquake will not be
lost on the terror masters.
Derrick Hill has been a staff editorial writer on the London Daily Express
and Daily Mail and now lives in
Spain.
|