|
Coming Home
Ted Galen
Carpenter
President Bush's decision (on Monday, August 16) to
withdraw a significant portion of America's military
presence in Europe and East Asia is an essential first
step in ending the international military subsidies the governments of these regions have enjoyed for
more than half a century. Germany will experience the
greatest drawdown of U.S. personnel; two divisions
(approximately 40,000 troops) will be leaving. Smaller, as yet
unspecified, withdrawals will take place from Britain,
Italy, South Korea and possibly Japan. The United
States will close nearly half of its hundreds of
military installations in Europe. If there is any bad
news in an otherwise gratifying story, it is that the
process may take as long as a decade to complete.
This initiative is a step that should have been taken
years ago. Indeed, Cato Institute scholars have
recommended a complete withdrawal of American forces
from Europe
and East Asia
since the end of the Cold War. That was a major theme of
my book, A Search for Enemies: America's Alliances
after the Cold War, published in 1992.
It is absurd that the United States has continued to
station 100,000 troops in Europe.
Since the demise of the
Soviet Union,
there is no serious security threat on the Continent.
The European Union has a larger population – nearly 400
million compared to America's 285 million. It also
has a larger economy than that of the United States –
11.4 trillion in annual GDP compared to less than 11
trillion for the United States and should certainly be
able to take care of the minor security problems (such
as the Balkan conflicts of the 1990s) that might arise
in the region from time to time.
The case for keeping troops in East Asia is nearly as
weak. For example, South Korea has twice the population
of communist North Korea and an economy 37 times larger.
It does not need to remain dependent on the United
States for its defense. A country with those advantages
should be able to build whatever military forces are
needed to deter or defeat its totalitarian rival.
President Bush deserves the gratitude of the American
people for deciding to withdraw 70,000 U.S. troops from
Europe and
East Asia. It
is especially gratifying that many of these troops will
be coming home rather than being redeployed overseas. It
is possible, of course that some of forces leaving
Europe and
East Asia
might be needed in the future to eradicate an Al-Qaeda
sanctuary, as the
United States
did in Afghanistan in 2001. But operations of
that magnitude will be the exception rather than the
rule in the war against Islamic terrorism. It would be
unfortunate if the Bush Administration decided to
redeploy the forces withdrawn from Europe
and East Asia
to Iraq or other client states in the Middle East. The
troops we already have in that region are a lightning
rod for angry Muslims, and increasing our "footprint"
will only breed more resentment.
Likewise, it would serve little purpose to simply
transfer the forces from Germany and elsewhere in "old
Europe" to
Romania,
Bulgaria, Poland and other countries in "new Europe."
Such a redeployment would increase
Washington's
temptation to use those countries for staging areas for
further meddling in the
Middle East.
Stationing troops in some portions of Eastern Europe
might also rile Russia and damage relations with Moscow.
If handled correctly, the withdrawal that President Bush
announced is a useful first step. But it needs to be
just the first step in a comprehensive disengagement
program. Over the next several years, the United
States should eliminate its entire military presence
in Europe and should withdraw at least all of its ground
forces from East Asia. Those commitments were designed
for a Cold War era that no longer exists. It is time to
bring America's security
strategy into the 21st century.
Ted Galen Carpenter
is vice president for defense and foreign policy studies
at the Cato Institute (www.cato.org) and a member of the
Coalition for a Realistic Foreign Policy (http://www.realisticforeignpolicy.org/).
|