|
Realist
Bibliophile
Looking to
Africa for Answers
Liberia: Portrait of
a Failed State
(New York: Reed Press, 2004)
It is a sad truth that Africa
receives far too little coverage in international
affairs journals (other than those specifically devoted
to African affairs)--unless there is a crisis. Then,
Africa is
thrust into the spotlight, but usually with little
appreciation for the continent's historical, economic
and political development, as if these sudden explosions
were sui generis.
There has also been a tendency to assume that African
precedents don't apply in other parts of the world, even
though the region is littered with failed attempts at
nation- and state-building and the wreckage of
"humanitarian interventions."
John-Peter Pham, a contributor to In the National
Interest, is seeking to remedy these deficiencies,
with his new work Liberia:
Portrait of a Failed State (New York: Reed Press,
2004). This work is relevant not only for those
concerned with developments in West Africa, but should
be read carefully for the lessons it contains for the
future success or failure of Western interventions in
Kosovo,
Afghanistan and Iraq. Its conclusions, highlighting the
inherent instability in any state where the ruling class
has few deep roots within the population and must rely
upon foreign support to maintain itself and warning
outside powers to resist the siren call of intervention
for intervention's sake, need to be carefully studied as
the United States commits to undertaking a
"generational" commitment to reshape the Greater Middle
East.
Pham's book begins with an excellent yet accessible
history of Liberia. From its inception, Liberia has had
a strained relationship with the United States;
envisioned as a refuge for U.S. African-Americans (both
free blacks and freed slaves) as well as for Africans
intercepted on the high seas, the U.S. government
nonetheless declined to take Liberia under its tutelage
as a colony (preferring, in essence, to let the private
sector take the lead in this case) and then declined to
offer recognition to the Liberian state for several
decades.
One cannot help but draw parallels with
Afghanistan
and Iraq in terms of the challenges faced by Liberia in
creating an effective central government that
nonetheless could respond to the needs of the
"indigenous" populations as well as the Americo-Liberians.
Liberia chose to set up a hyper-centralized state that
had little legitimacy in the peripheral areas; the end
result, after civil war and devastation, is that the
country today, as he concludes in the postscript, is a
"bazaar of spoils" to be divided up among warlords.
Pham also discusses how, "in the vacuum of a failed
state
it was almost inevitable that the neighboring
states would be drawn in. And once they were involved,
any discussion of restoring the peace to Liberia
required taking into account the regional situation." So
Liberia's civil war which began in December 1989 drew
in the surrounding states and became a factor in their
own domestic and foreign policies. Not only did refugees
pour across the border nearly 1/3 of the country's
population fled in the first year of the civil war but
a "friend of my enemy is my friend" cycle developed
where leaders in surrounding countries such as Sierra
Leone or Ivory Coast who supplied aid to one faction or
another found the favor returned when Liberians provided
aid and assistance to their political enemies. In
addition, Nigeria wanted to assert its regional primacy
and saw the civil war as a way to establish its hegemony
in West Africa. (Again, shades of Iraq; how its internal
political workings are of intimate concern to Iran,
Syria and Turkey).
Pham's book is an excellent case study of what went
wrong in Liberia and also a warning to those who feel
that interventions can solve anything. "In the end,
every political community must accept responsibility for
assuring its own viability." This is sound advice to
consider as the United States and its partners unveil
grandiose plans to reconstruct and renovate states
around the world.
|